| 
Thank you for reviewing company and industry highlights. If you
would like additional information on the topics discussed, please
feel free to contact us.

May 2007
Make
Sure You Have the Right Insurance to Protect Your Business
By
Joyce M. Rosenberg, Associated Press
When
many small-business owners think about insurance, it's often about
property and casualty coverage. But there are many other kinds of
insurance, including some that apply to specific industries or
professions, that owners should consider.
Many
small businesses do not buy enough insurance -- not only are they
underinsured in dollar terms but also in the types of insurance they
buy, said Loretta Worters, vice president for communications of the
Insurance Information Institute, a New York-based trade group.
"You
have to look at the vulnerabilities and think what would be the worst
thing that would happen to my business right now and plan for those
possibilities," Worters said.
The
organization's Web site, www.iii.org, has a section on small-business
insurance that explains various kinds of coverage that small
companies should consider, starting with basics such as property and
liability insurance available in many commercial policies. There also
is information on business interruption insurance, critical to
helping many small businesses survive in the event of a disaster, and
the types of insurance that owners with employees need to buy, such
as workers compensation insurance.
The
site also has sections about some of the industry-specific coverage
that is available. For example, the section of the site dedicated to
food-service businesses details coverage for spoilage -- so if your
refrigeration breaks down and you are not at fault, you can recover
the cost of the inventory lost -- and for mechanical breakdowns.
It
also discusses employee dishonesty insurance, something that a
restaurant owner might want to consider; unfortunately, not everyone
with access to the cash register is law-abiding.
There
is also a section about insurance for home-based businesses. Many
people who operate businesses out of their homes might not realize
that their standard homeowners' policy will not cover all their
business equipment, and it most certainly will not provide coverage
in case of a business-related accident on the premises.
And
such an accident is not far-fetched -- if someone delivering a
package for your business or a customer dropping off a check falls on
your steps and is injured, your homeowners' policy will not protect
you.
Other
business owners are also a great resource. An owner of a similar
business can tell you the kinds of insurance you need -- and give you
a referral to a good insurance agent.
There
is likely to be plenty of information available from a trade group
representing your industry or profession, and it also is likely to
have names of agents.
But,
keep in mind, some organizations might operate their own insurance
agencies or be affiliated with specific insurers or brokers; that's
not necessarily a problem, but it does mean they might be biased in
favor of those concerns.
You
also can learn more about insurance by contacting SCORE, the
organization of retired executives who dispense free advice to
small-business owners on a wide variety of topics, including
insurance. If you visit www.score.org and type in your request in the
section called "Ask SCORE for Business Advice," you'll get
a list of SCORE counselors you can contact by e-mail who are likely
to have expertise in the area you are trying to learn about.
You
can also reach SCORE at 800-634-0245.
Source:
InsuranceNewsNet
Maryland
Workers' Comp Writer Offers Free Anti-Fraud Kit
Maryland
workers' compensation insurance carrier IWIF is offering a
fraud-fighting toolkit designed to help its policyholders, insurance
agents and business owner’s combat fraud.
The
free kit defines the various types of workers' comp fraud. It
includes 'Red Flags of Fraud,' a list of warning signs of possible
claimant fraud; actual case summaries of recent fraud convictions;
and two anti-fraud posters for employers to post in their workplaces.
Furthermore,
the kit explains how the law distinguishes between fraud and
betterment. "Sometimes, what appears to be fraudulent activity,
especially pertaining to claimants, turns out to be a case of
betterment, not theft," explains Jerry Landsman, IWIF director
of fraud.
Source:
Insurance Journal
Ga.
Supreme Court Cites 'Continuous Employment' in Workers Comp Award
In a
narrow margin to approve workers compensation benefits for the family
of a deceased Florida resident, the Georgia Supreme Court cited a
doctrine of "continuous employment" in its 4-3 decision,
voiding two previous rulings.
The
State Board of Workers' Compensation affirmed the court's decision in
case number S06G0891, a construction co. et al v. the individual.
The
employee died from injuries sustained in an auto accident that
occurred on Aug. 11, 2002, while he was driving a truck provided by
his employer. He lived in a Fayetteville, Ga. apartment while
employed there, also provided by the construction company as a
condition of employment while working as a superintendent of a
construction project in Jackson, Ga.
When
the employee’s former wife sought dependency benefits for his now
11-year old son, the employer and its insurer refuted the claim
saying that the individual’s death did not occur in the course of
his employment.
Off
duty at the time of the accident, the individual was using the
company vehicle to move furniture from Tennessee to a storage
facility in Georgia, according to the ruling.
However,
the appellate division of the State Workers' Compensation Board
determined the individual suffered a compensable injury because "at
the time the injury was sustained, he was an employee in continuous
employment driving an employer-provided vehicle who had concluded a
personal mission and had resumed the employer's business because he
was driving to either his job site or to his employer-provided
housing."
Under
Georgia's doctrine of continuous employment there is broader workers'
compensation coverage afforded an employee who is required by his
employer to live near a company work site.
The
ruling stated that the employee is "in effect, in continuous
employment, day and night, and activities performed in a reasonable
and prudent manner for the health and comfort of the employee,
including recreational activities, arise out of and are in the course
of the employment."
It
was undisputed that the employee was engaged in a personal mission
unrelated to his employment when he delivered family furniture to his
storage shed. However, the appellate division of the State Board of
Workers' Compensation found that his deviation from his employment
had ended and he had resumed his employer's business by the time he
sustained the injury.
Source:
Insurance Journal
Kentucky
Mine Owner Pleads Guilty to Workers Comp Fraud
The
owner and operator of a mining company in Perry County, Ky., pleaded
guilty to mail fraud in U.S. District Court after special
investigators with Kentucky Employers' Mutual Insurance discovered he
was misrepresenting the size of his company in order to reduce the
amount of the workers' compensation premium his business would have
to pay, the insurer reported.
A
U.S. Postal Inspection Service investigation confirmed the owner
mailed fraudulent payroll records to KEMI and other insurance
providers.
"Employers
who under report payroll to their workers' compensation insurance
company are engaged in an illegal practice that gives them an unfair
advantage over others in their respective industry," stated
Roger Fries, president and CEO of KEMI. "KEMI is very serious
about ensuring that payrolls are accurately reported and that
policyholders who operate with integrity are protected from
businesses that use these types of illegal tactics to gain an edge in
the marketplace."
Source:
Insurance Journal
Mass.
Employer Sentenced to Read Book for Lying About Work Safety
Worcester
(Massachusetts) Superior Court Judge Francis Fecteau has sentenced a
Templeton man to two and one-half years for committing perjury in a
workers' compensation claim proceeding at the Department of
Industrial Accidents.
The
judge also ordered the man to read the book "Integrity" by
author Stephen Carter and write a 1,000-word essay.
The
man was found guilty of forging a document to show he had provided
employees with safety goggles, according to investigators.
The
individual, age 43, was sentenced to two and one half years in the
House of Correction, with the sentence suspended for three years. The
state had requested that he be sentenced to serve 18 months in the
House of Correction.
Judge
Fecteau also ordered the individual to read the book "Integrity"
by author Stephen Carter, to write a 1,000-word essay on the book and
to publicly speak three times about his wrongdoings.
In
July 1998, an employee at the individual’s company sustained a
serious eye injury causing him to lose his eye on the job. The
employee filed a claim for workers' compensation benefits but that
claim was denied, and the employee subsequently commenced a suit at
the DIA.
One
of the issues before the DIA was whether the company provided its
employees, including the injured worker, with safety glasses before
he injured his eye in the 1998 accident. In preliminary proceedings
before the DIA, the company owner argued that he had provided safety
glasses to all his employees before the accident. In support of his
position, he submitted an apparent invoice from a safety supply
products company which was dated July 28, 1997.
However,
before the DIA trial commenced, the employee's attorney obtained
evidence which demonstrated that the 1997 invoice was forged. During
his testimony under oath at the DIA, the owner falsely stated that he
never looked at, touched, or altered the 1997 invoice.
At
trial, a former employee testified that the owner altered the date on
the invoice for an order of safety glasses by using white-out and
making copies of it so the alteration was not visible.
Judge
John G. Preston of the DIA ultimately ruled in favor of the injured
employee and ordered double damages in the case.
The
company owner was indicted by a Suffolk County Grand Jury on Sept.
12, 2005. His trial began on March 5 and continued over four days
Source:
Insurance Journal
Texas
Workers' Comp Claimant Works 3 Jobs After Reporting Injury
Texas
Mutual Insurance Company reported that an individual residing in
Houston, has pleaded guilty to workers' compensation fraud-related
charges. He worked for three different employers while collecting
workers' comp benefits, Texas Mutual said.
A
Travis County District Court ordered the employee to serve a
five-year probated sentence, repay $8,893 in benefits and pay a $250
fine.
The
employee reported a job-related injury while working as a chemical
blender for a company in Houston. He claimed he was unable to work as
a result of the injuries, and Texas Mutual began paying him
disability income benefits.
An
investigation found that the injured employee was working for three
different employers while collecting benefits. State law requires
injured workers to contact their workers' comp insurance company when
they return to work.
Source:
Insurance Journal
Fla.
Tree Service Owner Charged with Workers' Comp Fraud
The
owner of a tree service company in Florida is facing a charge of
operating without workers' compensation insurance.
The
owner allegedly admitted to operating for eight years without the
state-mandated coverage, after an employee incurred a staggering
medical debt due to an injury he received on the job.
The
owner, was arrested on the charge on March 29 and was booked into the
Sarasota County Jail. If convicted on the charge filed against him,
he could be sentenced to up to 15 years in prison in addition to
restitution and fines.
Detectives
with the Department of Financial Services (DFS), Division of
Insurance Fraud, began investigating the company after an employee
suffered a catastrophic injury on the job nearly two years ago and
incurred more than $255,000 in unpaid medical bills.
Detective
Steven Firestone was the division's lead investigator and the
Sarasota County Sheriff's Office assisted with the arrest.
"Workers'
compensation insurance is required by state law to protect workers,
and is especially crucial to those serving in high-risk jobs,"
said Florida CFO Alex Sink. "This individual knowingly put his
employees at risk, and we believe he deserves the maximum penalty
under the law."
On
July 1, 2005, the employee’ left arm and hand were crushed by a
falling 12-foot section of tree. He incurred $255,759 in medical
expenses.
Detectives
said because the owner operated outside of the law, the employee
found himself solely responsible for all injury-related bills.
However, if convicted, the owner could be held responsible for all
expenses that would have been covered by the workers' compensation
insurance, including the employee’s medical bills, rehabilitation
expenses, and loss of wages
Source:
Insurance Journal
Mass.
to Hear 13.4% Workers' Comp Rate Cut
Massachusetts
Insurance Commissioner Nonnie Burnes will convene a public hearing on
a proposed 13.4 percent reduction in workers' compensation rates at
10:00 a.m. on April 5, at the Division of Insurance, One South
Station, Boston.
The
Workers' Compensation Rating and Inspection Bureau of Massachusetts
(WCRIB) submitted a bid for a 13.4 percent rate decrease effective
Sept. 1, 2007.
If
the WCRIB's filing is approved, workers' compensation rates in
Massachusetts would be 64 percent less than they were in 1991 when
the state's workers' compensation reform law was passed, according to
WCRIB, which is the licensed rating organization that files rates
with the Division of Insurance on behalf of insurers.
Rates
can go down because workplace injury claims have, according to Paul
Meagher, president of the WCRIB. "From the combined efforts of
insurers, employers, workers and regulators, the frequency of
workplace injuries has continued to decline in Massachusetts. As a
result, overall costs for both indemnity and medical claims in
Massachusetts have declined in spite of continual increases in
average claim severity and medical cost inflation."
Meagher
credited insurers for contributing to the decrease in claim frequency
"by working with employers to provide safe work environments for
employees."
Source:
Insurance Journal
Older News...

"Truth has no special time of its own. Its hour is now – always."
– Albert Schweitzer
Legal Notice | © 2026, Applied Risk Control, Corp.
|